Personal tools
You are here: Home → Members → millerj's Home → RLC Summer 2007 → Food for thought: Human v2.0 (BBC via YouTube)
Navigation
« August 2008 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2
34 5 6 7 89
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
 
Document Actions

Food for thought: Human v2.0 (BBC via YouTube)

Not long ago, I caught this BBC program rerun on PBS. Once you see all of it (it comes in multiple parts), you'll agree that the program motivates us to get a better handle on the growing possibilities of human-technology interfaces. Does the program motivate you with the way it communicates its awe of the possibilities? Does it motivate you with fear and national security implications? Let me know what you think once you've watched it. Hyperlinks and embeds after the jump.

Food for thought: Human v2.0 (BBC via YouTube)

Be forewarned that the documentary is a bit sensational. With that said, it echoes some themes the krept into invited presentations at the mathematical biology meetings I attended in the last 18 months.

The official homepage for this broadcast is [here]. The web page has additional commentary on some of the ideas discussed in the documentary.

Part 1 (of 6) of the YouTube upload

URL: [here]

Embed:

Part 2 (of 6) of the YouTube upload

URL: [here]

Embed:

Part 3 (of 6) of the YouTube upload

URL: [here]

Embed:

Part 4 (of 6) of the YouTube upload

URL: [here]

Embed:

Part 5 (of 6) of the YouTube upload

URL: [here]

Embed:

Part 6 (of 6) of the YouTube upload

URL: [here]

Embed:

Powered by Plone

This site conforms to the following standards:

Section 508 WCAG Valid XHTML Valid CSS Usable in any browser
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation's Interdisciplinary Training for Undergraduates in Biology and Mathematics program under Grant No. 0436348, "Research-focused Learning Communities in Mathematical Biology," and Grant No. 0337769, "Mathematical Biology Initiative." Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.